Set up your Free Think University account to access free courses, unlock scholarships, and experience other community benefits.


Forgot your password? Click here.

Not a member? Click here.

Need help logging in? Click here.


Enter your email address below and we'll send you an email to reset your password.


We could not find your email address in our system. Please contact for additional help.


Your password has been sent to your email address on file.


Please contact the River Foundation for more information on your scholarship requirements.


Pro-Life, Pro-Choice,
or Something Else?

The Socio-Economic Considerations

Another aspect of the abortion debate is the economic and racial inequality it expresses.  A simple survey of the statistics shows both of these factors to be slanted toward the poor and minority populations.  The following article presents these statistics from the CDC.

Pregnancy and Abortion Rates Among Teens by Race

By Alex B. Berezow (Source)

The CDC has released rather sobering data on the large discrepancy between the races (white, black, Hispanic) in regard to teenage pregnancy and abortion rates. The data below is from 2009 and represents teens aged 15-19.


The teenage pregnancy rates are as follows:

Whites: 42.8 per 1,000 (less than 1 in 20)

Blacks: 114.5 per 1,000 (more than 1 in 9)

Hispanics: 100.5 per 1,000 (almost exactly 1 in 10)

In other words, both black and Hispanic teens are more than twice as likely to become pregnant as their white cohorts. Strikingly, the abortion rate among black teens (41.1 per 1,000) is almost equal to the pregnancy rate among white teens.

These numbers are tragic for at least two major reasons. First, regardless of your opinion on abortion, it is sad that so many women are faced with a life-changing decision at such a young age. Second, many of these young women will go on to become single mothers. The poverty rate for single mother households is 30.9%, compared to only 6.3% for married households. (See U.S. Census Bureau spreadsheet.) Poverty, of course, is linked to many undesirable outcomes, such as poor health and crime. It’s a vicious cycle in which poverty begets more poverty.

Therefore, any discussion about how to close the enormous racial wealth gap in America must address the large discrepancy in teenage pregnancy rates between the races.

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “QuickStats: Rates of Pregnancies and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Teens Aged 15–19 Years, by Race/Ethnicity — United States, 2009.” MMWR 62 (48): 989.

The ramifications of these statistics are hotly debated, with one side stating that “free” abortion is helpful to the poor minorities, while the other side believes it to be a genocidal way of preventing the poor minorities from growing in number.

Trent Franks is the U.S. Representative for Arizona’s 8th congressional district, serving in Congress since 2003.  In the following excerpted speech from the floor of the House of Representatives, Rep. Franks states some of these statistics and his view on what they mean.

Thus the debate over abortion is not simply theoretical, but affects certain people groups more than others.  These statistics cannot be ignored.